|
Home : Legal Encyclopedia : Death penalty Legal Encyclopedia - Death penalty
death penalty: an overviewThe death penalty, or capital punishment, may be prescribed by Congress or any state legislature for murder and other capital crimes. The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty is not a per se violation of the Eighth Amendment's (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentviii) ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Furthermore, the Sixth Amendment (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentvi) does not require a jury trial on the sentencing issue of life or death. Not all states provide for the death penalty. In the landmark case, Coker v. Georgia (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct-cgi/get-us-cite/433+584), 433 U.S. 584 (1977), the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is a grossly disproportionate punishment for the crime of rape of an adult woman. The Court came to this conclusion by considering objective indicia of the nation's attitude toward the death penalty in rape cases. At the time, only a few states allowed for executions of convicted rapists. More recently, in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZS.html), the Supreme Court used the same line of reasoning to rule that executions of mentally retarded criminals are "cruel and unusual punishments" which are prohibited by the Eighth Amendment (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentviii). In Roper v. Simmons (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-633.ZS.html) (03-633) (2005), the Supreme Court invalidated the death penalty for all juvenile offenders. The majority opinion pointed to teenagers' lack of maturity and responsibility, greater vulnerability to negative influences, and incomplete character development, concluding that juvenile offenders assume diminished culpability for their crimes. The Supreme Court has established that for death penalty sentencing the sentencer's discretion be narrowly guided as to the circumstances that justify imposing the death penalty and that the sentencing process should be individualized. In Ring v. Arizona (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-488.ZS.html), the Supreme Court ruled that a jury, rather than a judge, must make a finding of "aggravating factors" where those factors underlie a judge's choice to impose the death penalty rather than a lesser punishment. For more details see the Cornell Law School Death Penalty Project (http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/lawlibrary/death/index.html). menu of sourcesFederal MaterialFederal Constitution and Statutes
Federal Judicial Decisions
State MaterialState Statutes
State Judicial Decisions
Other ReferencesKey Internet Sources
Other TopicsRetrieved from "http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/Death_penalty". Content is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. |




