Legal Encyclopedia - Death penalty

Table of contents

death penalty: an overview

The death penalty, or capital punishment, may be prescribed by Congress or any state legislature for murder and other capital crimes. The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty is not a per se violation of the Eighth Amendment's (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentviii) ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Furthermore, the Sixth Amendment (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentvi) does not require a jury trial on the sentencing issue of life or death. Not all states provide for the death penalty.

In the landmark case, Coker v. Georgia (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct-cgi/get-us-cite/433+584), 433 U.S. 584 (1977), the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is a grossly disproportionate punishment for the crime of rape of an adult woman. The Court came to this conclusion by considering objective indicia of the nation's attitude toward the death penalty in rape cases. At the time, only a few states allowed for executions of convicted rapists.

More recently, in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZS.html), the Supreme Court used the same line of reasoning to rule that executions of mentally retarded criminals are "cruel and unusual punishments" which are prohibited by the Eighth Amendment (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentviii).

In Roper v. Simmons (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-633.ZS.html) (03-633) (2005), the Supreme Court invalidated the death penalty for all juvenile offenders. The majority opinion pointed to teenagers' lack of maturity and responsibility, greater vulnerability to negative influences, and incomplete character development, concluding that juvenile offenders assume diminished culpability for their crimes.

The Supreme Court has established that for death penalty sentencing the sentencer's discretion be narrowly guided as to the circumstances that justify imposing the death penalty and that the sentencing process should be individualized. In Ring v. Arizona (http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-488.ZS.html), the Supreme Court ruled that a jury, rather than a judge, must make a finding of "aggravating factors" where those factors underlie a judge's choice to impose the death penalty rather than a lesser punishment.

For more details see the Cornell Law School Death Penalty Project (http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/lawlibrary/death/index.html).

menu of sources

Federal Material

Federal Constitution and Statutes

Federal Judicial Decisions

State Material

State Statutes

State Judicial Decisions

Other References

Key Internet Sources

Other Topics

Category: Criminal Justice


Retrieved from "http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/Death_penalty". Content is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License.


Need An Employment Law Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Were your rights violated?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Want to contact an Employment Law lawyer in Washington, DC? ...Get a free case evaluation from one of our Employment Law lawyers in Washington, DC now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Employment Law Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Employment Law case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Employment Law Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.