Employment Law - Jury Verdicts

Please choose a legal issue for more:



______ $30,000 - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Wrongful Discharge - Intentional Tort - Wrongful Discharge
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a clerk-typist by Defendant Industrial Belting. During the 18 months plaintiff worked for defendant, defendant's male employees allegedly asked her out on dates, touched her, and made profane and/or suggestive comments to her. Plaintiff requested a leave of absence for one week. Defendant denied the request; however, plaintiff took the leave of absence anywa...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (114164) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Constructive Discharge - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a school bus driver by Defendant School District of Pontiac. She allegedly was the victim of verbal sexual harassment and obscene gestures made by personnel in the bus garage. Plaintiff reported the improprieties to her superior. She claimed that the response was inadequate and requested a transfer to a custodial job. After defendant granted the transfer, pl...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (114531) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ $65,002 Breakdown: $1 actual damages against each defendant; $20,000 punitive damages against Alexander and $45,000 punitive damages against Southeastern Security. - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Emotional Distress - Punitive Damages - Intentional Tort - Sexual Harassment
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a data entry clerk by Defendant Southeastern Security Insurance. Defendant Alexander was the vice- president of underwriting and the nephew of the owner of the company. Plaintiff confronted her immediate supervisor about alleged sexual comments made by the supervisor and Defendant Alexander. Plaintiff's supervisor apologized and promised to talk to Defend...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (101580) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Assault & Battery - Sexual Harassment - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a factory worker by defendant company. Defendant Davis was allegedly plaintiff's supervisor on an overtime project. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant Davis entered the women's restroom and sexually assaulted her. She reported the incident and Defendant Auto Style conducted an investigation. During the course of the investigation plaintiff allegedly partici...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (112979) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ Defense verdict on Elliott-Larson claims. Directed verdict on retaliation claim. - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Retaliation - Defense Verdict - Sexual Harassment
Facts: Plaintiff, who is white, was employed as a bookkeeper by defendant. Personnel at the store were a 50/50 mix of black and white. A magazine with a picture of Madonna was allegedly labeled with plaintiff's name and obscene phrases, and there were repeated incidents of vulgar graffiti in the men's restroom. Plaintiff believed that a black employee whom she did not get along with was ...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (113251) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ $132,000 noneconomic damages plus interest and attorney fees yielded a total verdict of $200,000. - Employment Sexual Harassment - Hostile Work Environment - Wrongful Discharge - Intentional Tort - Sexual Harassment
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as an assistant at Defendant North American Financial. Defendant loan officers Bierekoven and Bassett allegedly sexually harassed plaintiff. The harassment took the form of daily inappropriate touching and remarks. After plaintiff began treating with a psychologist and confronted defendants, the harassment ceased for a while. Defendant President Smith allegedly...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (113587) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ $15,000 on breach of commission claim and no cause as to wrongful discharge and sexual harassment claims. - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Wrongful Discharge - Wrongful Discharge - Labor Law - Contract - Collection - Sexual Harassment
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a salesperson by Defendant Heartland Homes, a manufacturer of pre-manufactured housing. Salespersons did not receive commissions until the sales were closed. Plaintiff was discharged by defendants and filed suit within 30 days.

Plaintiff alleged that she was an excellent employee who could not be discharged without just cause and that she was d...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (113672) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ $100,000 joint and several. - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Loss Of Position - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a closing processor by Defendant Delta Financial. Defendant Kuehl, a supervisor, allegedly sexually harassed plaintiff at work; holding her hand, touching her buttocks and asking her to go to a hotel with him. The harassment continued over a period of several months. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant Kuehl finally gave her an ultimatum indicating that she wou...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (114161) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ Defense verdict. See Editor's Note. - Assault & Battery Assault & Battery - Minister - Sexual Harassment - Intentional Tort - Defense Verdict
Facts: Defendant Atha was the pastor of a church in which plaintiff, a black male, was an active, influential member. Defendant Atha allegedly sexually assaulted plaintiff on two occasions. One of the incidents occurred while plaintiff was a patient at Defendant Bethesda Hospital's facility. Defendant Atha visited plaintiff at the hospital and allegedly attempted to hold plaintiff's hand. A...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (122239) Login for Employment Law Verdict
______ $500,000 - Employment Employment - Sexual Harassment - Va Hospital - Harassment - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a nurse at defendant's VA hospital. She was allegedly sexually harassed by the director of the VA hospital. The director, as head of the EEO at the facility, was the person entrusted with enforcing the hospital's policies against discrimination and harassment. Plaintiff claimed that an internal EEO complaint she filed was virtually ignored because no one wa...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (116800) Login for Employment Law Verdict

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.


Pages:   1   2   3   4   5   6   ...   Next

Need An Employment Law Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Were your rights violated?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Employment Law Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Employment Law case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Employment Law Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.